<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fake Chuck Westfall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>&#34;I&#039;m sorry to hear that the truth insults you.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Fake Chuck Westfall</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fake Chuck Westfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, but it does not include the full firmware source code like Samsung. So it&#039;s very limited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but it does not include the full firmware source code like Samsung. So it&#8217;s very limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Eduardo S.</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduardo S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck... i must be sign this wrong: under Canon USA web site, under 5diii there is a downloadable SDK kit, quote: &quot;The Canon Digital Camera SDKs are designed for computer programmers who wish to develop customized software applications for Canon digital cameras&quot; --&gt; is this the real thing for developers make the real stuuf come alive? or is just other Canon BS?

cheers
E.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck&#8230; i must be sign this wrong: under Canon USA web site, under 5diii there is a downloadable SDK kit, quote: &#8220;The Canon Digital Camera SDKs are designed for computer programmers who wish to develop customized software applications for Canon digital cameras&#8221; &#8211;&gt; is this the real thing for developers make the real stuuf come alive? or is just other Canon BS?</p>
<p>cheers<br />
E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 5D Mark III VS Nikon D800 Image Quality – DXOMark Sucks Balls by Ted</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/canon-5d-mark-iii-vs-nikon-d800-image-quality-dxomark-sucks-balls/#comment-5797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-5797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading the responses to this fun post, I reassured myself that buying a Nikon dslr could be a fatal mistake. I could be mistaken for one of the idiots here. Good God, there so many of them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the responses to this fun post, I reassured myself that buying a Nikon dslr could be a fatal mistake. I could be mistaken for one of the idiots here. Good God, there so many of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Fake Chuck Westfall</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fake Chuck Westfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naw man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naw man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Fake Chuck Westfall</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fake Chuck Westfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes we had already discussed the award winning &lt;a href=&quot;http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/fucked-for-the-foreseeable-future/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Viewfinder Closing Mechanism&lt;/a&gt; a while ago. It&#039;s a known request but thanks for mentioning it again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we had already discussed the award winning <a href="http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/fucked-for-the-foreseeable-future/" rel="nofollow">Viewfinder Closing Mechanism</a> a while ago. It&#8217;s a known request but thanks for mentioning it again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by The Beauty Queen 2013</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Beauty Queen 2013]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d wish Canon would make a very simple ff camera, but with a great image quality. Some dumb camera like Leica, but with a files like from medium format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d wish Canon would make a very simple ff camera, but with a great image quality. Some dumb camera like Leica, but with a files like from medium format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Barry Pressman</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Pressman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like Canon&#039;s lawyers just got up your ass, Chuck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Canon&#8217;s lawyers just got up your ass, Chuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by Chris K.</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would never think about buying the 6D no thanks, but my 5D III is awesome. Here is what I would like from Canon as they do listen when people complained about canon not having multiple exposure in their cameras they listened and now they do great, it is even better than Nikons multiple exposure as is canons HDR in camera, but here is my gripe from the 5D III, I do long exposures and canon gives us a stupid rubber piece to close off the viewfinder LOL so silly, so please tell them to make an extra part so we can buy and install that, because I will not use the crap rubber part or nor put a hat over my viewfinder, BTW 5D III is a pro camera and needs those things, so please Canon make that part for us;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never think about buying the 6D no thanks, but my 5D III is awesome. Here is what I would like from Canon as they do listen when people complained about canon not having multiple exposure in their cameras they listened and now they do great, it is even better than Nikons multiple exposure as is canons HDR in camera, but here is my gripe from the 5D III, I do long exposures and canon gives us a stupid rubber piece to close off the viewfinder LOL so silly, so please tell them to make an extra part so we can buy and install that, because I will not use the crap rubber part or nor put a hat over my viewfinder, BTW 5D III is a pro camera and needs those things, so please Canon make that part for us;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls by LP</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/canon-inc-rape-feature-requests-and-why-the-canon-eos-6d-sucks-balls/#comment-5791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=1028#comment-5791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fucking shit Chuck, it was about time:

1 - Someone raped you.
2 - You acknowledge that the 6D is bullshit, a step  below the already bullshitty D600...
3 - Someone speaks aloud &#039;bout the companies we support and maintain, they are simply dishonest with all of us loyal costumers.

Keep it up my friend...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fucking shit Chuck, it was about time:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Someone raped you.<br />
2 &#8211; You acknowledge that the 6D is bullshit, a step  below the already bullshitty D600&#8230;<br />
3 &#8211; Someone speaks aloud &#8217;bout the companies we support and maintain, they are simply dishonest with all of us loyal costumers.</p>
<p>Keep it up my friend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing the Canon 600EX-RT Flash by Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls &#124; Fake Chuck Westfall</title>
		<link>http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/introducing-the-canon-600ex-rt-flash/#comment-5790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canon Inc. rape, feature requests, and why the Canon EOS 6D sucks balls &#124; Fake Chuck Westfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/?p=827#comment-5790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] yeah, maybe I was a little too hard on them in the previous post. Especially since Canon Inc. has shown us in recent years that they do listen. But during the discussion I also mentioned, and we talked about, the possibility of releasing an [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] yeah, maybe I was a little too hard on them in the previous post. Especially since Canon Inc. has shown us in recent years that they do listen. But during the discussion I also mentioned, and we talked about, the possibility of releasing an [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>